The inscription is on the pedestal of the image. No description in Agrawala.

#Bhattacharyya_1930:45 describes the plate as "of good copper" so I have shown it as copper, not as alloy. A single plate, inscribed on both sides, thick and without rim. It weighs 1700 grams with the seal. The surface is damaged in several places by hitting with a hard instrument; there is also corrosion damage.

A stone slab with the left edge damaged. Part of its bottom side has also been cut away and lost after it was found but before it was delivered to the Calcutta museum, possibly to adjust its size for fixing in some other building. Dimensions above are for the extant fragment.

A smooth slab.

A slab of "a variety of basalt stone" (Gokhale_1967:1). Presently in three fragments. Since their history is shared, the fragments are not represented separately here.

A single plate, the first of a set of two or more, with the rest lost. Its surface is flat, without raised rims. Inscribed only on one side, presumably the verso. The hole for the ring was near the left-hand side (as viewed on the inscribed side), which is broken off so the remnant of the hole is now an indentation of the short side. The inscribed area was not damaged by this loss.

A single plate, wider ("higher") in the middle than at the edges. The edges are in some spots thicker than the surface, but the plate was probably not fashioned deliberately thicker around the edges. It is fairly thick (no figure available; weight ~500 gm), but the engraving is deep and shows through the back in many places.

A single plate, the first of a set, inscribed only on the verso. Its surface is flat, without raised rims. The hole for the connecting ring is on the left-hand side, vertically at the centre, and horizontally about a third of the way in from the left edge. Its dimensions are nowhere reported, but are presumably very close to those of %OB00153.

A set of three plates of an original set of four, the last inscribed only on the inner side, the others on both faces. Their surface is flat, without raised rims. The hole (1 cm in diameter) for the connecting ring is on the left-hand side, vertically at the centre, and horizontally about 5 cm from the left edge. The first plate as well as the connecting ring and the seal are lost.

A flat plate inscribed on both sides, without raised rims. The hole (1 cm in diameter) for the connecting ring is on the left-hand side, vertically at the centre, and horizontally about 5 cm from the left edge. 

A flat plate inscribed on both sides, without raised rims. The hole (1 cm in diameter) for the connecting ring is on the left-hand side, vertically at the centre, and horizontally about 5 cm from the left edge. 

A flat plate inscribed only on the recto, without raised rims. The hole (1 cm in diameter) for the connecting ring is on the left-hand side, vertically at the centre, and horizontally about 5 cm from the left edge. 

A thick plate inscribed on one face only, presumed the verso. The edges are thickened into rims. Perforated about the middle of the upper side for the connecting ring. The weight of the plates is reported by #Pandey_1949-50:264 as 1.5 seers each. Pandey has apparently not seen the plates personally and the figure seems excessive, even 1400 grams for the two plates sounds a bit too much.

A thick plate inscribed on one face only, presumed the recto. The edges are thickened into rims. Perforated about the middle of the upper side for the connecting ring. There is a seal impression on the bottom of this plate. The weight of the plates is reported by #Pandey_1949-50:264 as 1.5 seers each.

Two plates, each inscribed on one face only. Dimensions above are for one plate. The edges are thickened, but the inscription is worn. There is a hole in the middle of the upper side, but the ring and seal are lost. There is, however, a seal impression on the bottom of the second plate.

A single copper plate inscribed on both sides. The proper right side (verso) of the plate bulges outward in the middle, where a seal was likely attached. The plate weighs 367 grams. The dimensions given above probably pertain to the inscribed area, not to the whole plate.

A set of four plates, the first and last inscribed only on the inner sides; the second and third on both faces. The plates were connected by a ring, but the ring itself was not closed and no seal was found. The hole for the ring is near the centre of the left-hand edge (relative to the writing on all faces).

A copper plate inscribed on the verso only. There is a hole for the connecting ring near the centre of the left-hand edge (relative to the writing).

A copper plate inscribed on both faces. There is a hole for the connecting ring near the centre of the left-hand edge (relative to the writing on both sides).

A copper plate inscribed on both faces. There is a hole for the connecting ring near the centre of the left-hand edge (relative to the writing on both sides).